TELESUPERVISION OR ONLINE SUPERVISION OF: 1- JUSTICE SYSTEMS, AUDIT SYSTEMS, LEGAL SYSTEMS, PROSECUTORS OFFICES AND ANY OTHER BODIES IN WHICH THE JUDICIARY EXERCISES ADMINISTRATION PROCUREMENT AND EXECUTION OF APPLICABLE STANDARDS, PARAMETERS AND METRICS, WHETHER NATIONAL OR INTERNATIONAL. 2- THE OBSERVANCE OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEXICO AND CANADA, REFERRED TO DIFFERENTLY BY EACH SIGNATORY; IN THE UNITED STATES, IT IS CALLED THE UNITED STATES-MEXICO-CANADA AGREEMENT (USMCA); IN CANADA, IT IS OFFICIALLY KNOWN AS THE CANADA-UNITED STATES-MEXICO AGREEMENT (CUSMA) IN ENGLISH AND THE ACCORD CANADA-ÉTATS-UNIS-MEXIQUE (ACEUM) IN FRENCH; AND IN MEXICO, IT IS CALLED TRATADO ENTRE MÉXICO, ESTADOS UNIDOS Y CANADÁ (T-MEC). THE AGREEMENT IS SOMETIMES REFERRED TO AS "NEW NAFTA" IN REFERENCE TO THE PREVIOUS TRILATERAL AGREEMENT IT IS MEANT TO SUPERSEDE, THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (NAFTA). FROM HERE ON AFTER REFFERRED TO AS CUSMA, USMCA, ACEUM AND/OR TMEC AND ALL ITS RULES; AS WELL AS PROCESSES, PLANS, PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS THAT CAN BE SUBJECT TO COMPLIENCE EVALUATION PANELS.CONSTRUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS, WORKS, INSTALLATIONS AND FACILITIES 3- THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS, FACILITIES AND INSTALLATIONS; 4- ANY OTHER SYSTEM, ENTITY, COMPANY, PROCESS, PLAN, PROGRAM, VENTURE AND/OR PROJECT THAT: A) IS SUSCEPTIBLE TO EVALUATION, AUDITING AND/OR CERTIFICATION; AND/OR B) WANTS OPPORTUNE CONTROL AND SECURITY OF SENSITIVE LEGAL, OPERATIVE, TECHNICAL OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF INFORMATION OR DATA BODY 1 - TELESUPERVISION OR ONLINE SUPERVISION OF JUSTICE SYSTEMS, AUDIT SYSTEMS, LEGAL SYSTEMS, PROSECUTORS OFFICES AND ANY OTHER BODIES IN WHICH THE JUDICIARY EXERCISES ADMINISTRATION PROCUREMENT AND EXECUTION OF APPLICABLE STANDARDS, PARAMETERS AND METRICS, WHETHER NATIONAL OR INTERNATIONAL. Innovation in Telesupervision or online supervision in the modality of remote work or telework of the Judicial Centers, Courts and Prosecutor's Offices in terms of their Operation and Administration in accordance with applicable Standards, Parameters, and metrics whether national or international This disclosure refers in general to the systems, models, methodologies and methods of the telesupervision or online supervision of Justice systems to evaluate, qualify, verify, validate the compliance or observance of applicable standards, parameters, metrics, and whether national or international in justice centers, including courts, legal systems, prosecutors' offices and any other bodies in which the judiciary exercises the Administration of Justice, Procurement of Justice and the execution of sentences (same as in this document, collectively they will be referred to as "judicial systems"). Judicial systems are exceptionally diverse in the various jurisdictions of the world. These judicial systems can be embodied, for example, in various letters, statutes, codes, treaties, guidelines, documents, guides, manuals, practices, precepts, protocols, recommendations, standards, reports and resolutions among hundreds of government entities, both formal and informal, recognized and unrecognized. However, in general, there is a lack of a solution for the recording of evidence, impartial and methodologically rigorous, which makes it possible to evaluate, verify, validate and know the situation in which the judicial systems are, through telesupervision or online supervision in the modality remote work or telework. The present model defines the solution to this need. This innovative solution recognizes the experience of multiple forums and programs, and the participation of experts and specialists who have formulated letters, codes, decalogues, guidelines, documents of good practices, guides, manuals, statutes, precepts, protocols, recommendations, rules, reports and resolutions around the world, which include, but are not limited to, best practices in the field of justice. Its outstanding level of innovation is based on the following: Independence of the evaluation: The telesupervision or online supervision program in the modality of distance work or telework of justice systems, is operated and executed by an interdisciplinary or collegiate team, which adjusts the terminology and applies the model, methodology and method of telework or work to distance, in order to evaluate judicial systems based on empirical evidence, regardless of the jurisdiction to which it belongs to evaluate, verify, validate and / or certify, instead of an evaluation based on self-evaluation by the responsible area or object of the supervision of the current Judicial System. Consideration of jurisdiction: Jurisdiction is seen as a base element that interacts with the different branches of government, specifically with users of the judicial system, being the focus of attention of the solution of tele-supervision or online supervision in the modality of remote work or telework. Working with methodological criteria and empirical data: The operational implementation and deployment of the evaluation uses a theoretical framework with methodological criteria and empirical data for the application of national or international standards, norms and metrics to be considered, to obtain a level of compliance or performance of the area under supervision. Universality: The tele-supervision or online supervision model in the modality of remote work or telework, integrates previously established standards and knowledge from international forums and programs to implement them as internationally recognized experience. Standards, metrics, indicators and evidence: In each standard, tele-supervision or online supervision in the modality of distance work or telework incorporates metrics, indicators and factual evidence, in order to determine the level of compliance of the judicial systems in a quantitative and qualitative way, with respect to the themselves. Incorporation of evidence in compliance with the standard: The methodology of telesupervision or online supervision in the modality of distance work or telework, collects different information that demonstrates the application, compliance or the occurrence of best practices in the Administration of Justice, Procurement of Justice and execution of sentences, by providing additional features such as analytical research, official documents, photographs and inspection reports. Mathematical determination of a compliance level: For each jurisdiction, the Compliance Level, as well as its commitment to maintain or improve it, is determined by a mathematical expression that defines the percentage of compliance with recognized national or international standards, norms, and metrics. Simultaneous control of the Telesupervision or online supervision processes in the modality of remote work or telework: The processes of telesupervision or online supervision are controlled and monitored by teleworking each relevant activity within the implementation, in real time, regardless of the judicial system or jurisdiction. Systematization of the process step by step: The model organizes the actions in the stages before, during and after the process of tele-supervision or online supervision in the modality of remote work or telework. The objective of the monitoring is to systematize the processes and activities within the Supervision Process among various jurisdictions. This system structures the information of any process by: activities, milestones, problems, risks and components of the task; Notifying the person responsible for the situation regarding the aforementioned elements. These notifications will be channeled through different electronic means in real time. The system also measures and evaluates the performance of each component in the evaluation process, which allows the manager to identify and understand which phase of the evaluation presents a problem. The realizations of a system or methodology can be recognized as international best practices. The best judicial practices can be achieved using the experience of the judicial systems and elements agreed by prestigious international forums, as well as experts and experienced officials of the judicial authority. The systems disclosed in this document can function to establish with rigorous methodological criteria and an empirical and impartial basis, to evaluate, verify, validate and verify the compliance or performance situation of the judicial systems from a perspective and global observance of best practices, using a mathematical formulation, to track and encourage the achievement, maintenance and improvement of its jurisdiction by those responsible. Further, The concepts and reports of the online telesupervision or supervision solution allow evaluating, verifying, validating, qualifying the judicial systems in any jurisdiction in the world according to their level of compliance or performance. The concept of telesupervision or online supervision in the modality of remote work or telework disclosed, also contemplates a system that administers, manages, monitors and controls the Evaluation Process, the Improvement Program or the maintenance of the level of compliance or performance in time real. TELESUPERVISION SYSTEM OR ONLINE SUPERVISION IN THE MODALITY OF REMOTE WORK OR REMOTE WORK OF JUSTICE SYSTEMS The online tele-supervision or supervision system in the modality of remote work or telework of justice systems is a solution that includes a set of components and elements to innovate in judicial administration, based on telework to evaluate its performance and operation in matters of the rule of law. Online tele-supervision or supervision in the modality of distance work or telework of justice systems is based on plans, programs, projects, information technologies and communication tools to carry out the evaluation process, program of improvement or maintenance of the level of compliance or performance of judicial systems in a dynamic, comprehensive and unlimited manner. The Telesupervision or online supervision model in the modality of distance work or telework aims to improve the performance of judicial systems, increase the level of trust of the user and citizen in the Administration of Justice, Procurement of Justice, as well as in the execution of sentences, improve the competitiveness and viability of investments in each country, state or region and seek the rule of law, institutionalizing a solution to investigate, update, incorporate, promote, implement, maintain, monitor and follow up on the best practices in the field of the Administration of Justice, Procurement of Justice, as well as in the execution of sentences. The courts can offer an important role in building a strong society. The main components, participants and members of the online tele-supervision or supervision of the Administration of Justice, Procuratorate of Justice, as well as in the execution of sentences, are natural and legal persons with a high level of experience and specialization in the best practices in the Administration of Justice, strategic planning, systematization and automation of processes and activities, science, disciplines and issues that deal directly or indirectly with the achievement of a better rule of law. An essential part of the online telesupervision or supervision model are jurisdictions, courts, legal systems, tribunals, prosecutors' offices and the person as an essential object of the Administration of Justice, Procurement of Justice, as well as in the execution of sentences. MODEL: The model integrates and interrelates a set of elements, components, processes and actors involved in Telesupervision or online supervision in the modality of distance work or telework of the Administration of Justice, Procurement of Justice, as well as in the execution of sentences. It incorporates a methodology and a method to evaluate judicial systems with independence and objectivity, based on empirical and epistemological information, carrying out analysis and research with methodological rigor within a theoretical framework avoiding self-evaluations, findings and assumptions directly or indirectly involved in the Administration of Justice, Procurement of Justice, as well as in the execution of sentences in any Jurisdiction. The evaluation process incorporated in this model allows its implementation in any judicial system of any jurisdiction in the world, as it incorporates and reinforces the use of regional methodologies and provides evidence of the results that can be used to position the operation or performance in the Administration of Justice, Procuration of Justice, as well as in the execution of sentences of any judicial system. The model also favors the control, monitoring and management of the Evaluation Process at milestones, events or stages in real time, with the use of advanced technologies and platforms, also considering the use of traditional means. The online telesupervision or supervision of the Administration of Justice, procuratory of Justice, as well as in the execution of sentences, controls and monitors the implementation of the model, methodology and method of each and every one of the components of the Process of parallel evaluation, systematically integrating a minute as documentary evidence of the fulfillment of the evaluation process tasks, respecting transparency. Company with rights to exploit intellectual property: Promotes, advises and supports the evaluation of judicial systems based on the model, methodology and method entrusted to Tripolarity MX, SA de CV (Tripolarity MX) Tripolarity MX: It holds rights to use the intellectual property of the model, methodology, method, graphic entity, brand and domains and develops innovations of the methodological criteria and empirical base of national and international standards, metrics, model, methodology and method to apply in evaluations to the judicial systems to improve the administration of justice. Area subject to evaluation: It works together with those responsible for evaluating, verifying and / or validating, in the preparation and implementation of the evaluation process of the Administration of Justice, Procurement of Justice, as well as in the execution of sentences by Telesupervisión or online supervision in the mode of remote work or telework. They collect and process all the information of each judicial system in order to diagnose them. Social communication area: Designs the strategic communication and media plan for online tele-supervision or supervision in the Administration of Justice, Procuratorate of Justice, as well as in the execution of sentences in the different stages of the evaluation process. Follow-up: Monitor and report in real time the status of the main processes in all jurisdictions. Area responsible for evaluating: It allocates resources on behalf of the jurisdiction and specifies the obligations of the participants in the evaluation process. Liaison: It assumes a collaborative participation in the relationship between the jurisdiction and the actors of the tele-supervision or online supervision in the modality of remote work or telework, which allows obtaining the decision and application of the resources for the evaluation. Area responsible for qualification: It recognizes and assigns value to the evaluation of tele-supervision or online supervision in the modality of remote work or telework and applies a quantitative value through opinions, research and objective and balanced data that affect the level of performance of the area responsible for impart justice. Collaborating areas: Promotes and sponsors tele-supervision or online supervision in the modality of distance work or telework of the Administration of Justice, Procuration of Justice or execution of sentences, in different areas of administration of justice in order to achieve a better State of Law. NGOs: They can participate, sponsor and promote Telesupervision or online supervision in the modality of distance work or telework to improve the Administration of Justice. Evaluation areas: It is based on tele-supervision or online supervision in the modality of distance work or telework to provide criteria, decisions and resources that guarantee that the jurisdiction applied the evaluation methodology in accordance with the guidelines of the model of tele-supervision or online supervision in the mode of remote work or telework. Quality assurance: It ensures the quality of the evaluation processes, improvement programs and maintenance of compliance levels, systematically reviewing them based on the guidelines of the tele-supervision or online supervision model in the modality of remote work or telework. Citizens and users: People who have direct contact with the judicial systems and the population corresponding to each jurisdiction. METHODOLOGY: The methodology is the sum of metrics, evidence, algorithms, formulas, factors, equivalences and elements that allow obtaining an accurate measurement of a judicial system with compliance with applicable national and international standards, metrics and indicators. The methodology of telesupervision or online supervision in the modality of remote work or telework, has five (5) branches or main themes: universe of standards, metrics and criteria; evaluation process; algorithm, Positioning of a Jurisdiction and Jurisdictional Evaluation. Universe of standards: The Universe of Standards is carefully compiled and selected based on existing standards, parameters and indicators from various international organizations and agencies aimed at improving the Administration of Justice, Procurement of Justice and execution of sentences, which include among others: Forums and their specific self-assessment measurement systems: International Framework for Judicial Excellence (IFCE) The European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) Ibero-American Judicial Summit (CJI) o Statute of the Ibero-American Judge o Regulations on access to justice for people in vulnerable situations (known as "Brasilia Rules") o Declaration of the Rights of the People in the field of Ibero-American judicial justice o Minimum rules of legal security in the Ibero-American sphere o Ibero-American Code of Judicial Deontology o Principles, Norms and Good Practices on the relationship between judicial authorities and the media o Ibero-American Decalogue for quality justice o Ibero-American Charter of Victims' Rights Programs of the National Center for State Courts (USA): Global measures of judicial performance CourTools Standards Measurement Systems: Those created in the Jurisdiction, now applicable by the telesupervision or online supervision model to reveal their competitive index: CourTools and related programs: o Global Court Performance Measures (CourTools International Version) o International framework for judicial excellence (broader version of global measures) o Independent self-assessment by country or state (tailor-made) Ibero-American Judicial Summit (Results and Products) European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), of the Council of Europe, through the Evaluation Report of European Judicial Systems, which collects data, statistics and some surveys, but does not apply an evaluation. Those created by the indicators of the level of competitiveness to reveal what they conceive as the rule of law or judicial performance, now considered by the model of tele-supervision or online supervision for a more objective and useful measurement in the Administration of Justice, Procuration of Justice and execution of sentences, for Users and the general population. European Union Justice Scoreboard, prepared by the European Commission, focused on the practical operation, financial aspects and rights of the Court's users. It is a compilation of information from the World Bank, CEPEJ and the World Justice Project. World Economic Forum, since 1979, through the Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) in 144 countries. Evaluates the rule of law as one of the main pillars, focusing on administrative aspects with a business perspective. World Justice Project, since 2006, through the Rule of Law Index in 98 countries. World Bank, since 1996, through the World Governance Indicators in 215 countries. One of the six aspects measured is the rule of law, understood as compliance with contracts of commitment, police, judiciary, absence of crime and violence. The data is collected through surveys of NGOs, institutes and private companies. The Universe of Standards methodology was developed by the Just Justice System based on the forums, programs and standards measurement systems mentioned above. It offers innovative and precise dimensions by integrating: Categories, subcategories, topics, subtopics and concepts of 1 an, correlated with the 487 universal International Standards; 1 to n indicators that correlate with categories, subcategories, topics, subtopics, and concepts; 1 to n evidence such as citations, codes, data, documents, files, guidelines, inspections, investigations, laws, plans, policies, procedures, programs, protocols, questionnaires, records, regulations, reports, reviews, statements, statutes , studies, surveys, as well as similar or related evidence that confirms the occurrence or not of compliance with any indicator. There are main categories, correlated with standards, indicators and evidence that, together, allow a multidimensional, quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the condition or situation in which the Administration of Justice finds itself in any judicial system. The concepts disclosed respect the existing measurement systems that currently exist for each precept of individualized systems, which have been agreed upon and accepted by all members of certain communities such as IFCE, CourTools, Global Measures, and those countries that are members. of the European Parliament, who have accepted the CEPEJ methodology, leaving aside the precepts of the Ibero-American Summit of Presidents of Supreme Courts. The main categories of the Universe of Standards are, among others: Access: Access to justice encompasses all indicators that provide information on the effectiveness and ease with which anyone can participate in a trial. Independence: Independence standards measure the objectivity, impartiality, reliability, and independence of those appointed to judge cases. Efficiency and effectiveness: The efficiency and effectiveness indicators provide information on whether a decision has been made, therefore, the judicial system is effective and whether the result of a trial is reached efficiently. Transparency: The measures of transparency and protection of personal data indicate whether the company acts as a witness to the fairness and objective execution provided by the judicial authority. These four categories can be applied regardless of the legal tradition to which a particular jurisdiction belongs. They have been selected for the fact that they allow to lay the foundations for an objective evaluation considering both empirical and normative data from any judicial system in the world, regardless of its level, scope or specialty. The evidence of the standards included in the Universe of Standards must be carefully analyzed, to judge whether the judicial system is complying with the indicators. The evaluation of the judicial system in terms of the Administration of Justice is determined by: The perception and index of inhibition of the citizen in front of the Judicial Power. The perceptions and indicators of users of a judicial system: User: Any person who can use the judicial system. The Judicial Power as part of the People's Government, was created to serve citizens and foreigners, there are real and potential users, but both views are important for the perception of the rule of law that prevails in the jurisdiction. Qualification: It is a dictum that focuses on the results of the evaluation that will be submitted to the judicial system and the level of evaluation obtained. Perception of the general population of the jurisdictions, on the way in which justice is administered in them. Qualitative and quantitative techniques are used in the analysis of the above. Evaluation Process: The Evaluation Process integrates a set of steps, stages, actions and activities to demonstrate compliance or non-compliance with the Standards. The evaluation process may be verified, valued and accredited by any person, whether belonging to the jurisdiction or outside it, as well as by any entity that provides an appropriately prestigious and methodologically rigorous evaluation criterion. The general objective of the evaluation process by telesupervision or online supervision in the modality of remote work or telework is to integrate a set of steps, stages, actions and activities to demonstrate the occurrence of the application of best practices in the field of the Administration of Justice, with the help of an algorithm. Algorithm: The algorithm for the evaluation of countries, states or regions establishes the relationship between the Evaluation Levels developed in accordance with prestigious and methodologically rigorous criteria. Defines the degree of compliance of a judicial system with the universe of standards, indicators, metrics and evidence. Monitoring: Control and monitoring system of the Evaluation Process, Improvement Program and maintenance of the level of compliance. The monitoring system will be based on project management tools recognized in the market and will allow a cross-sectional view of the status of the processes, which can be configured to the assigned access and adapted according to the evaluation plans. The monitoring system can include a status subsystem to monitor the progress of the evaluation processes, improvement programs and maintenance of performance levels that have been developed, which can be maintained in real time, being able to display information in various known formats regarding the stages of the project, progress, incidents, requested changes, risks, knowledge and lessons learned related to the evaluation processes, improvement programs or maintenance of compliance with the judicial system's performance. Said events may include reports or occurrences on issues related to evaluation processes, programs to improve or maintain the level of compliance, reports on the level of compliance or non-compliance with National and International Standards and other similar factors. The information entered into the system can be categorized according to the topics and / or problems with which it relates and then displayed through the status subsystem. It will be appreciated that those of ordinary skill will understand that the embodiment and subsystems described in this document are exemplary and that the concepts disclosed may be implemented depending on design decisions, using variations of these subsystems that may be implemented as separate subsystems or combined into multiple. systems. faceted subsystems within the scope of the disclosed concepts. The information entered into the system can be categorized according to the topics and / or problems with which it relates and then displayed through the status subsystem. It will be appreciated that those of ordinary skill will understand that the embodiment and subsystems described in this document are exemplary and that the concepts disclosed may be implemented depending on design decisions, using variations of these subsystems that may be implemented as separate subsystems or combined into multiple. systems. Subsystems within the scope of the disclosed concepts. The information entered into the system can be categorized according to the topics and / or problems with which it relates and then displayed through the status subsystem. It will be appreciated that those of ordinary skill will understand that the embodiment and subsystems described in this document are exemplary and that the disclosed concepts can be implemented depending on design decisions, using variations of these subsystems that can be implemented as separate subsystems or combined into multiple subsystems. systems. Subsystems within the scope of the disclosed concepts. The status subsystem may include a global status system that can display progress reports for any jurisdiction subject to the Assessment Process, improvement program, or compliance level maintenance, and may also be able to identify, report, and / o show jurisdiction or evaluation processes, improvement programs or maintenance of compliance and / or performance levels that may be in a situation of possible bias, risk, failure or other similar deviation. The system can also include a measurement and evaluation subsystem that can track and display information related to a comparison of the planned progress of the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of performance levels versus the actual progress reported thereof. Such a measurement and evaluation system can highlight areas in which progress has been in line with planned progress and / or deficient or delayed areas, and the reasons for this. The system may allow the evaluation results to be parameterized so that they can be compared through the evaluation of other judicial systems based on these parameters. Any of the parameters that affect the evaluation process. The system may include a user interface, preferably a graphical user interface, that is intuitive and easy to use. The user interface can present screens or websites that can display information in different formats (such as signposts, classification tables, impact / complexity matrices, geo-referenced map, technical specifications, requirements, critical events, graphs, agreements, reports of progress and any other known method). The information displayed can be related to the evaluation process, program for improvement or maintenance of performance levels and its description, start dates, end dates, days remaining, responsible, areas in coordination, audiovisual evidence of the current state, resources exercised, budget committed and available, The system may also include a subsystem for the assessment and evaluation of the international standards used in the Evaluation Process, Improvement Program or maintenance of compliance with the performance level. It includes an evaluation of the international standards applied in each jurisdiction by agents and / or other specialized users in the same study. Approval of said International Standards by said agents and users and the registration within the system database of said national or international standards and their evaluation. Similarly, a meeting monitoring subsystem can be included to help organize and coordinate meetings of all personnel working on the various aspects of the Evaluation Process, Program Improvement or maintenance of the level of compliance. The monitoring subsystem can also provide a method to capture, safeguard, or summarize critical requirements or events discussed at the meeting or any agreements discussed or reached. An alert subsystem may be included to send notifications to personnel working on various aspects of the assessment process, improvement program, or compliance maintenance. Such notifications can be sent, for example, when a component of the assessment process, improvement program, or compliance maintenance reports success, failure, or bias. These notifications can be sent by email, recorded messages, voicemail, or any other means of communication. The system may include a database subsystem that maintains all information collected and relied on during the evaluation process, the improvement program, or the maintenance of compliance and performance levels. A subsystem of the control center can govern the entry of data into the database. The control center system will allow agents to enter information related to said events directly through a computer terminal, mobile phone or any other computer device, through access to a database, website or any other known means. where such information can be entered. Information can be categorized, processed, analyzed, and otherwise manipulated through the use of computing devices that have access to it. Support and monitoring subsystems can be included to provide information on agreements, requirements, instructions, milestones and / or events in progress or required for effective implementation. This subsystem can also include a notification mechanism to disseminate the status of the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of compliance and performance levels in real time through email, recorded messages, voicemail or any other known means. A control information subsystem can contain data and information on topics, categories and metrics involved in the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of compliance with performance levels for judicial systems. This subsystem can be part of the control center, or as discussed more generally above, it can optionally be implemented as a separate subsystem. The system can be built to support the linking of information with the general topics to which it relates. Information related to such topics can be tracked, searched and analyzed using such linking information. Similarly, requests for access to public information can be tracked and linked to the related evaluation process, improvement program, maintenance of performance levels, tests, results, or other indicators used throughout the process. The system can allow the preparation of reports related to the evaluation process, improvement program or compliance maintenance, and said reports can be generated and / or dynamically updated in real time based on the information contained in the system and / or or your database. Such reports can allow users or agents to add notes, comments, conclusions, or recommendations to the reports for evaluation by staff working on them. The system can dynamically generate requests for information to judicial systems that are in the process of evaluation, improvement program or maintenance of compliance. Such requests can be sent selectively to some of those court systems, or globally to all of those court systems. 2- TELESUPERVISION IN THE MODALITY OF REMOTE WORK OR TELEWORK TO SUPERVISE THE OBSERVANCE OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MEXICO AND CANADA, REFERRED TO DIFFERENTLY BY EACH SIGNATORY; IN THE UNITED STATES, IT IS CALLED THE UNITED STATES-MEXICO-CANADA AGREEMENT (USMCA); IN CANADA, IT IS OFFICIALLY KNOWN AS THE CANADA-UNITED STATES-MEXICO AGREEMENT (CUSMA) IN ENGLISH AND THE ACCORD CANADA-ÉTATS-UNIS-MEXIQUE (ACEUM) IN FRENCH; AND IN MEXICO, IT IS CALLED TRATADO ENTRE MÉXICO, ESTADOS UNIDOS Y CANADÁ (T-MEC). THE AGREEMENT IS SOMETIMES REFERRED TO AS "NEW NAFTA" IN REFERENCE TO THE PREVIOUS TRILATERAL AGREEMENT IT IS MEANT TO SUPERSEDE, THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (NAFTA). FROM HERE ON AFTER REFFERRED TO AS CUSMA, USMCA, ACEUM AND/OR TMEC AND ALL ITS RULES; AS WELL AS PROCESSES, PLANS, PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS THAT CAN BE SUBJECT TO COMPLIENCE EVALUATION PANELS. TELESUPERVISION OF CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC RULES WITH REMOTE WORK TO EVALUATE COMPLIANCE AND TO SECURELY AND TIMELY ARCHIVE ANY DOCUMENTS THAT MAY BE NEEDED TO RESPOND IN ANY COMPLIANCE, RESOLUTION OR EVALUATION PANEL. Innovation in Telesupervision in the modality of distance work or telework of work centers, companies, entities and foreign trade organizations in North America in terms of their operation and administration in accordance with applicable standards, parameters, metrics, whether national or international, that allow evidence the observance or compliance with the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules DISCLOSURE FIELD: This disclosure refers in general to the systems, models, methodologies and methods of the telesupervision of CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules to evaluate, qualify, verify, validate the compliance or observance of standards, applicable metric parameters, in the centers of work, including companies, sectors, branches of economic activity and any other bodies that are under the precepts, rules, guidelines and standards of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC (same as in this document, they will be referred to collectively, hereinafter, as systems or rules of CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC). CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules can be embodied, for example, in various letters, statutes, codes, treaties, guidelines, documents, guides, manuals, practices, precepts, protocols, recommendations, standards, reports and resolutions among hundreds of government entities, both formal and informal, recognized and unrecognized. However, in general, there is a lack of a solution for the recording of evidence, impartial and methodologically rigorous, which makes it possible to evaluate, verify, validate and know the situation in which companies find themselves with respect to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules, through tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework. The present model defines the solution to this need. This innovative solution recognizes the experience of multiple forums and programs, and the participation of experts and specialists who have formulated letters, codes, decalogues, guidelines, good practice documents, guides, manuals, statutes, precepts, protocols, recommendations, rules, reports. and joint resolutions between Mexico-United States and Canada, which include, among others, best practices in the labor, environmental, anti-corruption, rules of origin, human rights, among others. Its outstanding level of innovation is based on the following: Independence of the evaluation: The tele-supervision program in the modality of remote work or teleworking of CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules , is operated and executed by an interdisciplinary or collegiate team, which adjusts the terminology and applies the model, methodology and method of teleworking or remote work , in order to evaluate compliance with CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules based on empirical evidence, regardless of the exporting company, body or entity to and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules for evaluation, verification and validation, instead of an evaluation based on self-evaluation by the area responsible or object of supervision of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules System. Consideration of the company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules: The company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, it is seen as a base element that interacts with the different government participants, specifically with users responsible for complying with the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules system, being the focus of attention of the solution of telesupervision in the modality of remote work or telework. Working with methodological criteria and empirical data: The operational implementation and deployment of the evaluation uses a theoretical framework with methodological criteria and empirical data for the application of the standards, norms and metrics to be considered, to obtain a level of compliance or performance of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules by the target area. of supervision. Universality: The tele-supervision model in the modality of remote work or telework, integrates previously established standards and knowledge of international forums and programs to implement them as internationally recognized experience. Standards, metrics, indicators and evidence: In each standard, tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework incorporates metrics, indicators and factual evidence, in order to determine the level of compliance with the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules in a quantitative and qualitative way, with respect to the themselves. Incorporation of evidence in compliance with the standard: The telesupervision methodology, in the modality of remote work or telework, collects different information that demonstrates the application, compliance or occurrence and observance of the provisions of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, by providing additional characteristics such as analytical research, official documents, photographs and inspection reports. Mathematical determination of a compliance level: For each company, organization or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, the level of compliance, as well as its commitment to maintain or improve it, is determined through a mathematical expression that defines the percentage of compliance with recognized national or international standards, norms, metrics. Simultaneous control of the Telesupervision Processes in the modality of remote work or telework: The telesupervision processes are controlled and monitored by means of the telework monitoring of each relevant activity within the implementation, in real time, regardless of the company, entity or body that is in the process of evaluating CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules. Systematization of the process step by step: The model organizes the actions in the stages before, during and after the telesupervision process in the modality of remote work or telework. The objective of the monitoring is to systematize the processes and activities within the Supervision Process among various areas of the company, entity or body. This system structures the information of any process by: activities, milestones, problems, risks and components of the task; Notifying the person in charge of the situation of the aforementioned elements. These notifications will be channeled through different electronic means in real time. The system also measures and evaluates the performance of each component in the evaluation process, which allows the manager to identify and understand which phase of the evaluation presents a problem. The realizations of a system or methodology can be recognized as international best practices. Best business practices in trade can be achieved using the experience of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules and elements agreed by international forums, as well as experts and officials with experience from the authority of each of the 3 countries with respect to the T-MEC. The systems disclosed in this document can function to establish with rigorous methodological criteria and an empirical and impartial basis, to evaluate, verify, validate and verify the compliance or performance situation of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules from a perspective and global observance of better practices, using a mathematical formulation, to track and encourage the achievement, maintenance and improvement of your company, body or entity of import export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules by those responsible. In addition, the realizations of this model can allow the supervision and control in real time of the process of evaluation, verification and validation of the progress on the improvement program and maintenance of a high level of compliance or performance. The concepts and reports of the telesupervision solution allow evaluating, verifying, validating, qualifying the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules in any company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules according to their level of compliance or performance. The tele-supervision concept in the modality of remote work or telework disclosed, also contemplates a system that administers, manages, monitors and controls the Evaluation Process, the Improvement Program or the maintenance of the level of compliance or performance in real time. The telesupervision system in the mode of remote work or teleworking of CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules is a solution that includes a set of components and elements to innovate in in trade management of companies, entities or organizations, based on teleworking to evaluate their performance and operation in export matters. The tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework of CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules is based on plans, programs, projects, information technologies and communication tools to carry out the evaluation process, improvement program o maintaining the level of compliance or performance of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules in a dynamic, comprehensive and unlimited manner. The Telesupervision model in the modality of remote work or telework aims to improve the performance of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules by the company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, increase the level of trust by reducing the risk of non-compliance with the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, improve competitiveness and the viability of investments in each country, state or region and seek the State of Law, institutionalizing a solution to investigate, update, incorporate, promote, implement, maintain, monitor and follow up on best practices in the field of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rule system. Companies, organizations and entities in trades can offer an important stake in establishing a strong partnership. The main components, participants and members of the tele-supervision of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, are natural and legal persons with a high level of experience and specialization in best practices, in compliance with CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, strategic planning, systematization and automation of processes and activities, science, disciplines and issues that deal directly or indirectly with the achievement of a better environment for export activity. An essential part of the telesupervision model are exporting companies, entities or organisms as an essential object of compliance with CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules. The model integrates and interrelates a set of elements, components, processes and actors involved in Telesupervision in the modality of distance work or telework of the company, organization or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules. It incorporates a methodology and a method to evaluate CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules with independence and objectivity, based on empirical and epistemological information, carrying out analysis and research with methodological rigor within a theoretical framework avoiding self-evaluations, findings and assumptions involved directly or indirectly in the import-export activity. The evaluation process incorporated in this model allows its implementation in any judicial system of any company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules in Mexico, the United States and Canada, as it incorporates and reinforces the use of regional methodologies and provides evidence of the results that can be used to position the operation or performance of the T- rules system. MEC by any exporting company, entity or body. The model also favors the control, monitoring and management of the Evaluation Process at milestones, events or stages in real time, with the use of advanced technologies and platforms, also considering the use of traditional means. The telesupervision of compliance or observance of CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, controls and monitors the implementation of the model, methodology and method of each and every one of the components of the Evaluation Process in parallel, systematically integrating a minute as documentary evidence of compliance of the tasks of the evaluation process, respecting transparency. Company with the rights to exploit intellectual property: Promotes, advises and supports the evaluation of companies, organizations and entities based on the model, methodology and method entrusted to Tripolarity MX, SA de CV (Tripolarity MX) Tripolarity MX: It holds rights over the use of the intellectual property of the model, methodology, method, graphic entity, brand and domains and develops innovations of the methodological criteria and empirical base of standards, metrics, model, methodology and method to apply in the evaluations to the Systems of Rules CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC to improve trade between Mexico, the United States and Canada. Area subject to evaluation: It works together with those responsible for evaluating, verifying and / or validating, in the preparation and implementation of the process of evaluation of compliance and observance of CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules by Telesupervisión in the modality of remote work or telework. They collect and process all the information of each exporting company, entity or organization in order to diagnose them. Social communication area: Designs the strategic communication and media plan for tele-supervision in the different stages of the evaluation process. Follow-up: Monitor and report in real time the status of the main processes in all companies, entities or agencies. Area responsible for evaluating: Allocates resources on behalf of the company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules and specifies the obligations of the participants in the evaluation process. Liaison: Assumes a collaborative participation in the relationship between the company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules and the actors of the tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework, which allows obtaining the decision and application of the resources for the evaluation. Area responsible for qualification: Recognizes and assigns value to the evaluation of tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework and applies a quantitative value through opinions, research and objective and balanced data that affect the level of performance of the company responsible for export / import . Collaborating areas: Promotes and sponsors tele-supervision in the modality of distance work or teleworking of the observance of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, in different areas of the company, entity or organism with the purpose of achieving a better trade between Mexico, USA and Canada. NGOs: They can participate, sponsor and promote Telesupervision in the modality of distance work or telework to improve commercial activity between Mexico, USA and Canada. Evaluation areas: It is based on tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework to provide criteria, decisions and resources that guarantee that the company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the rules, CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC applied the evaluation methodology in accordance with the guidelines of the tele-supervision model in the modality of remote work or telework. Quality assurance: It ensures the quality of the evaluation processes, improvement programs and maintenance of compliance levels, systematically reviewing them based on the guidelines of the tele-supervision model in the modality of remote work or telework. Citizens and users: People who have direct contact with the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules and the population corresponding to each member country of the T-MEC. The methodology is the sum of metrics, evidence, algorithms, formulas, factors, equivalences and elements that allow obtaining an accurate measurement of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC system of rules with compliance with applicable standards, metrics and indicators. The telesupervision methodology in the modality of remote work or telework has five (5) branches or main themes: universe of standards, metrics and criteria; evaluation process; algorithm, positioning of a company, entity or body with regard to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rule system. Universe of standards: The Universe of Standards is carefully compiled and selected based on existing standards, parameters and indicators from various international organizations and organizations aimed at improving export activity, including among others: Initially identified literal content of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC that may be subject to evaluation and/or resolution panels in import-export companies or entities (The subjects to evaluate as well as the information to secure can be increased to any subject of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC: LABOR: "Main provisions included in the chapter: The implementation of internationally recognized rights under the national legislation of each Party, including acceptable conditions on minimum wages, working hours, and occupational safety and health (Article 23.3). A commitment against imports produced with forced or compulsory labor, or with forced or compulsory child labor (article 23.6). The first binding provision regarding the fight against violence against workers in the exercise of their rights (article 23.7). A commitment to the protection of migrant workers (article 23.8) and to the adoption of policies that contribute to the protection of workers from discrimination in employment based on sex (article 23.9). The incorporation of a public communication mechanism, within the reach of people of all the Parties, regarding matters related to the application of this Chapter (article 23.11). The commitment to ensure, in Mexican legislation, the effective implementation of the right to freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining by workers (Annex 23-A). Subjecting the Chapter to the same dispute resolution mechanism that applies to all commercial obligations in the Agreement (the NAALC had its own dispute resolution mechanism). " ENVIRONMENT: "The main components are: A mechanism to facilitate effective cooperation, through the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC), made up of a Ministerial Council, a Joint Public Consultative Committee and a Secretariat. The Process of "Petitions on the effective application of environmental legislation" ("SEM Process", for its acronym in English). Specific commitments for the effective application of environmental legislation by each Party. A specific dispute settlement mechanism. " ANTI-CORRUPTION: "The main components are: The Parties shall adopt or maintain laws that penalize the offer or request of undue advantages to a public official, as well as other acts of corruption that affect international trade or investment. New elements include embezzlement, embezzlement, and misappropriation or other diversion by an official for your benefit. Commits the Parties to adopt or maintain measures to: (i) select and train public officials in positions vulnerable to corruption, (ii) promote transparency in the exercise of public functions, (iii) identify and manage the conflicts of interest, (iv) provide financial statements, and (v) facilitate the reporting of acts of corruption. Measures to protect the anonymity of whistleblowers will be adopted or maintained Commits the Parties to encourage companies to prohibit facilitation payments and to take measures to raise awareness among public officials not to accept such payments. The foregoing, taking into account the detrimental effects that such payments entail. Establishes the commitment of the Parties to encourage companies to adopt compliance programs, to identify and combat corruption within their structures. Strengthens cooperation and coordination between authorities, as well as facilitating the exchange of experiences and best practices. The chapter is subject to the dispute settlement mechanism with certain modifications and exceptions that attend to the nature of the commitments adopted by the Parties, and providing for the participation, in the consultative stage, of the competent authorities in the matter, and the selection , in the contentious stage, of panelists with experience in this field. " RULES AND PROCEDURES OF ORIGIN: "For a product to receive preferential tariff treatment in the T-MEC, it must comply with a minimum of production processes, manufacturing operations or the contribution of added value made in the countries that are part of the Agreement. This set of provisions, requirements or conditions are defined in the chapter on the rules of origin, and the provisions related to the issuance of proofs or certification of origin, actions to verify the origin of the goods, are established in the same way. as well as the sanctions for irregularities in the matter of rules of origin. " Measurement of standards: Those agreed by the 3 countries Mexico, the United States and Canada, now applicable by the telesupervision model to reveal their compliance index with CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules. The methodology that offers innovative and precise dimensions by integrating: - Categories, subcategories, topics, subtopics and concepts of 1 year, correlated with the agreed standards or applicable to the T-MEC; - 1 to n indicators that correlate with categories, subcategories, topics, subtopics and concepts; - 1 year evidence such as citations, codes, data, documents, files, guidelines, inspections, investigations, laws, plans, policies, procedures, programs, protocols, questionnaires, records, regulations, reports, reviews, statements, statutes, studies , surveys, as well as similar or related evidence that confirms the occurrence or not of compliance with any indicator. There are main categories, correlated with standards, indicators and evidences that, together, allow a multidimensional, quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the condition or situation in which compliance with CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules by any company is found. , body or entity of import export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules. The concepts disclosed respect the existing measurement systems that currently exist for each individualized system precept, which have been agreed upon and accepted by all members of the T-MEC. The categories, principles or topics of the universe of standards are, among others: Labor Environment Anti-corruption Rules and procedures of Origin Each topic includes all the indicators that provide information on the effectiveness and ease with which any company, body or entity in trade and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, it complies with the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC provisions of that category. The standards measure with objectivity, impartiality and reliability the observance and fulfillment of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules. User: Any company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules that the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rule system can use. Qualification: It is a dictum that focuses on the results of the evaluation that companies, entities or organisms will submit and the level of evaluation obtained. Perception of the company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules of the countries that make up the T-MEC, on the way in which the application of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules is administered. Qualitative and quantitative techniques are used in the analysis of the above. Evaluation Process: The Evaluation Process integrates a set of steps, stages, actions and activities to demonstrate compliance or non-compliance with the Standards. The evaluation process may be verified, valued and accredited by any person, whether belonging to the company, body or entity in trade and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules or outside of it. The general objective of the evaluation process by tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework is to integrate a set of steps, stages, actions and activities to demonstrate the occurrence of the application of the best practices in the field of enforcement. of CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules, with the help of an algorithm. Algorithm: The algorithm for the evaluation of companies, entities or organisms establishes the relationship between the Evaluation Levels developed in accordance with prestigious and methodologically rigorous criteria. It defines the degree of compliance of a company, entity or body with respect to the universe of standards, indicators, metrics and evidence. Monitoring: Control and monitoring system of the Evaluation Process, Improvement Program and maintenance of the level of compliance. The monitoring system will be based on project management tools recognized in the market and will allow a cross-sectional view of the status of the processes, which can be configured to the assigned access and adapted according to the evaluation plans. The monitoring system can include a status subsystem to monitor the progress of the evaluation processes, improvement programs and maintenance of performance levels that have been developed, which can be maintained in real time, being able to display information in various known formats regarding the stages of the project, progress, incidents, requested changes, risks, knowledge and lessons learned related to the evaluation processes, improvement programs or maintenance of compliance with the judicial system's performance. Said events may include reports or occurrences on issues related to evaluation processes, programs to improve or maintain the level of compliance, reports on the level of compliance or non-compliance with National and International Standards and other similar factors. The information entered into the system can be categorized according to the topics and / or problems with which it relates and then displayed through the status subsystem. It will be appreciated that those of ordinary skill will understand that the embodiment and subsystems described in this document are exemplary and that the concepts disclosed may be implemented depending on design decisions, using variations of these subsystems that may be implemented as separate subsystems or combined into multiple. systems. faceted subsystems within the scope of the disclosed concepts. The information entered into the system can be categorized according to the topics and / or problems with which it relates and then displayed through the status subsystem. It will be appreciated that those of ordinary skill will understand that the embodiment and subsystems described in this document are exemplary and that the concepts disclosed may be implemented depending on design decisions, using variations of these subsystems that may be implemented as separate subsystems or combined into multiple. systems. Subsystems within the scope of the disclosed concepts. The information entered into the system can be categorized according to the topics and / or problems with which it relates and then displayed through the status subsystem. It will be appreciated that those of ordinary skill will understand that the embodiment and subsystems described in this document are exemplary and that the disclosed concepts can be implemented depending on design decisions, using variations of these subsystems that can be implemented as separate subsystems or combined into multiple subsystems. systems. Subsystems within the scope of the disclosed concepts. The status subsystem can include a global status system that can display progress reports for any company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules subject to the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of the level of compliance, and may also be able to identify, report and / or show a company, body or entity of import-export and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules or evaluation processes, improvement programs or maintenance of compliance and / or performance levels that may be in a situation of possible bias, risk, failure or other similar deviation. The system may also include a measurement and evaluation subsystem that can track and display information related to a comparison of the planned progress of the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of performance levels versus the actual reported progress of the same. Such a measurement and evaluation system can highlight areas in which progress has been in line with planned progress and / or deficient or delayed areas, and the reasons for this. The system can allow to parameterize the results of the evaluation so that they can be compared through the evaluation of other CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules based on these parameters. Any of the parameters that affect the evaluation process. The system may include a user interface, preferably a graphical user interface, that is intuitive and easy to use. The user interface can present screens or websites that can display information in different formats (such as signposts, classification tables, impact / complexity matrices, geo-referenced map, technical specifications, requirements, critical events, graphs, agreements, reports of progress and any other known method). The information displayed can be related to the evaluation process, program for improvement or maintenance of performance levels and its description, start dates, end dates, days remaining, responsible, areas in coordination, audiovisual evidence of the current state, resources exercised, budget committed and available, The system may also include a subsystem for the assessment and evaluation of the international standards used in the Evaluation Process, Improvement Program or maintenance of compliance with the performance level. It includes an evaluation of the international standards applied in each company, organization or entity in trade and therefore subject to the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC rules by agents and / or other specialized users in the same study. Approval of said International Standards by said agents and users and the registration within the system database of said national or international standards and their evaluation. Similarly, a meeting monitoring subsystem can be included to help organize and coordinate meetings of all staff working on the various aspects of the Assessment Process, Program Improvement or maintaining the level of compliance. The monitoring subsystem can also provide a method to capture, safeguard, or summarize critical requirements or events discussed at the meeting or any agreements discussed or reached. An alert subsystem may be included to send notifications to personnel working on various aspects of the assessment process, improvement program, or maintenance of compliance. Such notifications can be sent, for example, when a component of the assessment process, improvement program, or compliance maintenance reports success, failure, or bias. These notifications can be sent by email, recorded messages, voicemail, or any other means of communication. The system may include a database subsystem that maintains all information collected and relied on during the evaluation process, the improvement program, or the maintenance of compliance and performance levels. A subsystem of the control center can govern the entry of data into the database. The control center system will allow agents to enter information related to said events directly through a computer terminal, mobile phone or any other computer device, through access to a database, website or any other known means. where such information can be entered. Information can be categorized, processed, analyzed, and otherwise manipulated through the use of computing devices that have access to it. Support and monitoring subsystems can be included to provide information on agreements, requirements, instructions, milestones and / or events in progress or required for effective implementation. This subsystem can also include a notification mechanism to disseminate the status of the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of compliance and performance levels in real time through email, recorded messages, voicemail or any other known means. . A control information subsystem can contain data and information on topics, categories and metrics involved in the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of compliance with the performance levels of the company, entity or body in the observance of the CUSMA / USMCA / ACEUM / TMEC Rules. This subsystem can be part of the control center, or as discussed more generally above, it can optionally be implemented as a separate subsystem. The system can be built to support the linking of information with the general topics to which it relates. Information related to such topics can be tracked, searched and analyzed using such linking information. Similarly, requests for access to public information can be tracked and linked to the related evaluation process, improvement program, maintenance of performance levels, tests, results, or other indicators used throughout the process. The system can allow the preparation of reports related to the evaluation process, improvement program or compliance maintenance, and said reports can be generated and / or dynamically updated in real time based on the information contained in the system and / or or your database. Such reports can allow users or agents to add notes, comments, conclusions, or recommendations to the reports for evaluation by staff working on them. The system can dynamically generate requests for information to the company, entity or body that is in the process of evaluation, improvement program or maintenance of compliance. Said requests can be sent selectively to some of the companies, entities or organizations, or globally to all. 3- TELESUPERVISION SYSTEM IN THE MODALITY OF REMOTE WORK OR TELEWORK TO SUPERVISE THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS, FACILITIES AND INSTALLATIONS. Innovation in Telesupervision in the modality of distance work or telework of work centers, companies, entities and organizations in construction of works or facilities in terms of its operation and administration in accordance with applicable standards, parameters, metrics, whether national or international, that allow evidence the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities This disclosure relates to systems, models, methodologies and methods of tele-monitoring the progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities to evaluate, qualify, verify, validate compliance or observance of standards, applicable metric parameters, in work centers, including companies, sectors, branches of economic activity and any other bodies that are under the precepts, rules, guidelines and standards of the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities(The same as in this document, they will be referred to as "progress of works and installations"). The Supervision of works and installations are standardized in the various parts of the world. Supervision of works and installations may be reflected, for example, in various ordinances, statutes, codes, treaties, guidelines, documents, guides, manuals, practices, precepts, protocols, recommendations, standards, reports and resolutions among hundreds of government entities, both formal and informal, recognized and unrecognized. However, in general, a solution for the recording of evidence, impartial and methodologically rigorous, is lacking, until now because its possible to evaluate, verify, validate and know the situation in which the companies find themselves with respect to the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities, by means of tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework. The present model defines the solution to this need. This innovative solution recognizes the experience of multiple forums and programs, and the participation of experts and specialists who have formulated letters, codes, decalogues, guidelines, good practice documents, guides, manuals, statutes, precepts, protocols, recommendations, rules, reports. and joint resolutions between specialists and schools, which include, among others, best practices in the field of activities prior to the execution of the work, during the execution of the work and subsequent ones, corresponding to the settlement or termination, among others. Its outstanding level of innovation is based on the following: Independence of the evaluation: The tele-supervision program in the modality of remote work to follow the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities, is operated and executed by an interdisciplinary or collegiate team, which adjusts the terminology and applies the model, methodology and method of teleworking or remote work, in order to assess compliance with the progress of works and installations based on empirical evidence, regardless of the company, body or entity and therefore reason for assessment, verification and validation, rather than an assessment based on self-assessment by the area responsible or subject to supervision. Consideration of the company, body or entity: The company, body or entity holds the system that follows progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities, it is seen as a base element that interacts with the different participants, specifically with users responsible for complying with the system progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities, being the focus of attention of the telesupervision solution in the modality of remote work or telework. Working with methodological criteria and empirical data: The operational implementation and deployment of the evaluation uses a theoretical framework with methodological criteria and empirical data for the application of the standards, norms and metrics to be considered, to obtain a level of compliance or performance. In the progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities by the area under supervision. Universality: The tele-supervision model in the modality of remote work or telework, integrates previously established standards and knowledge of international forums and programs to implement them as internationally recognized experience. Standards, metrics, indicators and evidence: In each standard, tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework incorporates metrics, indicators and factual evidence, in order to determine the level of compliance in the progress of works and installations in a quantitative and qualitative way, with respect to them. Incorporation of evidence in compliance with the standard: The telesupervision methodology, in the modality of remote work or telework, collects different information that demonstrates the application, compliance or the occurrence and observance of the provisions in the progress of works and installations, by providing additional features such as analytical research, official documents, photographs and inspection reports. Mathematical determination of a compliance level: For each company, organization or entity, the Level of compliance, as well as your commitment to maintain or improve it, is determined by a mathematical expression that defines the percentage of compliance with recognized national or international standards, norms, and metrics. Simultaneous control of the Telesupervision Processes in the modality of remote work or telework: The telesupervision processes are controlled and monitored by monitoring each relevant activity within the implementation, in real time, regardless of the company, entity or body that is in the process of evaluating the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities. Systematization of the process step by step: The model organizes the actions in the stages before, during and after the telesupervision process in the mode of remote work or telework. The objective of monitoring is to systematize the processes and activities within the supervision process between various areas of the company, entity or body. This system structures the information of any process by: activities, milestones, problems, risks and components of the task; Notifying the person in charge of the situation of the aforementioned elements. These notifications will be channeled through different electronic means in real time. The system also measures and evaluates the performance of each component in the evaluation process, which allows the manager to identify and understand which phase of the evaluation presents a problem. Simultaneously, it will carry out quality evaluations of the Process and its performance in all the different companies undergoing evaluation. The standard of a system or methodology can be recognized as international best practices. Best business practices in the construction and infrastructure industry can be achieved using the telesupervision of the progress in works, installations and facilities being conceptualized, studied, constructed and maintained with elements agreed by international forums, as well as experts and officials with experience. The systems disclosed in this document can work to establish rigorous methodological criteria and an empirical and impartial basis, to evaluate, verify, validate and verify the compliance or performance situation of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities from a perspective and global observance of best practices, using a mathematical formulation, to track and encourage the achievement, maintenance and improvement of your company, agency or entity in construction or infrastructure and therefore subject to the supervision of progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities. In addition, the realizations of this model can allow the supervision and control in real time of the process of evaluation, verification and validation of the progress on the improvement program and maintenance of a high level of compliance or performance. The concepts and reports of the telesupervision solution allow to evaluate, verify, validate, qualify and evaluate construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities in any company, body or entity according to their level of compliance or performance. The tele-supervision concept in the modality of remote work or telework disclosed, also contemplates a system that administers, manages, monitors and controls the evaluation process, the program of improvement or maintenance of the level of compliance or performance in real time. TELESUPERVISION SYSTEM FOR THE CONTROL AND VISIBILITY OF THE PROGRESS IN CONSTRUCTION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS, INSTALLATIONS AND FACILITIES The telesupervision system in the mode of remote work or telework for the progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities is a solution that includes a set of components and elements to innovate in the management of construction of companies, entities or agencies, based on Teleworking to evaluate the performance and operation in terms of building. Telesupervision in the mode of remote work or telework or the system of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities; is based on plans, programs, projects, information technologies and communication tools to carry out the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of the level of compliance or performance in the of works and installations in a dynamic, comprehensive and unlimited way. The kind of Supervision in the modality of remote work or telework aims to improve performance in construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities by the company, body or entity of construction, to increase the level of confidence by reducing risks of non-compliance in progress, improve the competitiveness and viability of investments in each country, state or region and seek the rule of law, institutionalizing a solution to investigate, update, incorporate, promote, implement, maintain, monitor and follow up on the best practices in the country of the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities. Companies, organizations and entities of construction can offer an important stake in building a strong partnership. The main components, participants and members of the tele-supervision of the progress of works and installations, are persons with a high level of experience and specialization in best practices, in compliance of the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities, strategic planning, systematization and automation of processes and activities, science, disciplines and issues that deal directly or indirectly with the achievement of a better environment for the activity of the construction. An essential part of the telesupervision model are exporting companies, entities or agencies as an essential object of compliance monitoring the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities. The model integrates and interrelates a set of elements, components, processes and actors involved in the telesupervision with the modality of remote work or telework of the company, body or entity of construction. It incorporates a methodology and a method to evaluate of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities with independence and objectivity, based on empirical and epistemological information, carrying out analysis and research with methodological rigor within a theoretical framework avoiding self-evaluations, findings and assumptions directly or indirectly involved in the activity of construction. The evaluation process incorporated in this model allows its implementation in any company, body or entity of construction, as it incorporates and reinforces the use of regional methodologies and provides evidence of the results that can be used to position the operation or performance of thein the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities. The model also favors the control, monitoring and management of the Evaluation process in milestones, events or stages in real time, with the use of advanced technologies and platforms, also considering the use of traditional media. The telesupervision of the compliance or progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities, controls and monitors the implementation of the model, methodology and method of each and every one of the components of the parallel evaluation process, systematically integrating a minute as documentary evidence of the fulfillment of the evaluation process tasks, respecting transparency. The actors of the model are the following: Company with rights to exploit intellectual property: Promotes, advises and supports evaluation of the progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities of companies, organizations and entities based on the model, methodology and method entrusted to Tripolarity MX, SA de CV (Tripolarity MX) Tripolarity MX: It holds rights to the use of intellectual property of the model, methodology, method, graphic entity, brand and domains and develops innovations of the methodological criteria and empirical base of standards, metrics, model, methodology and method to apply in evaluations of construction and infrastructure works, facilities and installations. Area subject to evaluation: Works together with those responsible for evaluating, verifying and / or validating, in the preparation and implementation of the compliance evaluation process and progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities with Telesupervision in the modality of remote work or telework. They collect and process all the information from the construction works and installations of the company, entity or body in charge of construction in order to diagnose them. Social communication area: Designs the strategic communication and media plan for tele-supervision in the different stages of the evaluation process. Follow-up: Track and report in real time the status of the main processes in all works and installations of the companies, entities or organizations involved. Area responsible for evaluating: Allocates resources on behalf of the company, body or entity of construction Y specifies the obligations of the participants in the evaluation process. Links: Assumes a collaborative participation in the relationship between the company, body or entity of construction and the actors responsible of tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework, which allows obtaining the decision and application of the resources for the evaluation. Area responsible for qualification: Recognizes and assigns value to the evaluation of tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework and applies a quantitative value through opinions, research and objective and balanced data that affect the level of performance in the progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities of the company. Collaborating areas: Promotes and sponsors tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework of the progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities in different areas of the company, entity or body. NGOs: They can participate, sponsor and promote the telesupervision in the modality of remote work or telework to improve the activity in the monitoring of construction and infrastructure works, facilities and installations through the works and installations advance system. Evaluation areas: It is based on tele-supervision in the modality of remote work or telework to provide criteria, decisions and resources that guarantee that the company, body or entity of construction, applied the evaluation methodology in accordance with the guidelines of the progress of works. Quality assurance: Ensures the quality of the evaluation processes, improvement programs and maintenance of compliance levels, systematically reviewing them based on the guidelines of the tele-supervision model of the construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities advance system, in the modality of remote work or telework. Citizens and users: People who have direct contact with Supervision of works and installations. METHODOLOGY: The methodology of the Telesupervision system to control the progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities; is the sum of metrics, evidences, algorithms, formulas, factors, equivalences and elements that allow obtaining an accurate measurement of the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities; with compliance with applicable standards, metrics and indicators. The methodology of the construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities, has five main branches or themes, universe of standards, metrics and criteria; evaluation process; algorithm, positioning of a company, entity or body with regard to the evaluation system progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities. Universe of standards: The Universe of Standards is carefully compiled and selected based on existing standards, parameters and indicators from various international organizations and agencies aimed at improving the construction activity, which include among others: Phase P: Initial Load File for Anchor Funding 1. Compliance with Funds and General Expenses guidelines 1.1 Creation of file and Technical file 1.2 File delivery 1.3 Contract 1.4 Compliance bond 1.5 Bank Letter 1.6 Invoice with autograph signature of the authorized official 1.7 Cover estimate 1.8 Warehouse Acknowledgment 1.9 Withholding Receipt and Integration Chart Phase 0: Conformation of File and Funding 1.10 Municipal Procedures 1.11 Local Procedures 1.12 Director responsible for works, site manager 1.13 Ground Cleaning 1.14 Surveillance 1.15 Insurance 1.16 Other Phase 1: Civil Work A. Preliminary and / or Site Works A.1 Preconstruction A.2 Stroke and Leveling A.3 Work Protections A.4 Stripping A.5 Disassembly and Dismantling A.6 Demolition A.7 Loading and Hauling A.8 Elevation of Materials A.9 Cleaning B. Platform and Service dirt roads B.1 Road Cut and configuration B.2 Haulage B.3 Improvement and enhancement B.4 Embankment C. Foundation C.1 Deep Foundation Stroke and leveling C.2 Deep Foundation Drilling C.3 Deep Foundation Piles (Pilas) C.4 Deep Foundation Pilot (Pilotes) C.5 Deep Foundation Coarse cleaning C.6 Surface Foundation Excavation C.7 Surface Foundation Foundation Elements C.7 Surface Foundation Slabs and pavements C.8 Surface Foundation Filler C.9 Surface Foundation Loading and Hauling C.10 Surface Foundation Waterproofing D. Structure D.1 Rebar Structure and Pillar D.2 Joist and Beams D.3 Slabs and pavements D.4 Wall D.5 Enclosure D.6 Coarse cleaning D.7 Staircase D.8 Other Elements E. Metallic Structure E.1 Anchorage Plaques E.2 Metal Columns E.3 Metal Beams E.4 Vents and contravents E.5 Mezzanines and metal roofs E.6 Paint E.7 Structure reinforcement maneuvers E.8 Staircase F. Brickwork Masonry F.1 Flattening and leveled masonry F.2 Fillers, Brickwork and Chamfers F.3 Cleanings F.4 Bases and plateaus F.5 Mouldings, molding and rowlock F.6 Grooves and Patches F.7 Other Masonry Elements G. Flattening and leveling G.1 Masonry Walls G.2 Ceiling Masonry G.3 Masonry Facades G.4 Other H. Civil Work for Facilities H.1 Electric H.2 Hydrosanitary H.3 Air Conditioning H.4 Others Phase 1.A Facilities or Installations I. Pipes I.1 Hydrosanitary installation I.2 Electrical installation I.3 Air conditioning installation I.4 Voice and data facilities I.5 Gas installations I.6 Home automation installations I.7 Fire Protection Network J. Mechanical, Engineering and Plumbing Facilities J.1 Hydraulic installation J.2 Sanitary installation J.3 Electrical installation J.4 Air conditioning Installation J.5 Voice, data and cctv installation J.6 Gas Installation J.7 Home automation installation J.8 Fire Protection Network Phase 2: Finishes and Coatings K. Finishes and Coatings K.1 Finishes in Pavements and Slabs K.2 Wall Finishing K.3 Ceiling Finishing K.4 Base and cover finishes K.5 Cleaning K.6 Others L. Drywall L.1 Drywall walls L.2 Drywall ceiling L.3 Drywall furniture L.4 Drywall Others M. Painting and Waterproofing M.1 Wall waterproofing M.2 Waterproofing gardeners M.2 Trays waterproofing M.3 Roof waterproofing M.4 Waterproofing terraces M.5 Waterproofing others M.7 Painting Walls M.8 Painting Ceiling M.9 Painting Gardeners M.10 Painting Trays M.11 Painting Roof M.12 Painting Façade N. Aluminum Works and inner doors N.1 Doors N.2 Windows N.3 Integral facades N.4 Bathrooms N.5 Railings N.6 Other O. Smithy O.1 Doors O.2 Windows O.3 Facades O.4 Railings O.5 Others P. Carpentry P.1 Doors P.2 Closets P.3 Furniture P.4 Other Carpentry elements Q. Special equipment Q.1 Kitchen Q.2 Elevators Q.3 Other R. Works Delivery R.1 Fine Cleaning Phase 3 Infrastructure S. Infrastructure S.1 Drinking water network S.2 Sanitary drainage network S.3 Electric Power network S.4 Fire Protection network T. Gardens T.1 Furniture T.2 Grass and Vegetation T.3 Others U. Others U.1 Others Phase F: Upload file for settlement 1. Settlement 1.1 Certificate of delivery and reception of the work 1.2 Updated technical information certificate 1.3 Photographic memory 1.4 Guarantees under the Public Works Law 1.5 Work Settlement 1.6 Closure of the Work Program 1.7 Photographic memory Measurement of standards: The agreed regional, national and international standards, now applicable by the telesupervision model of the progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities to reveal your compliance rate. The methodology that offers innovative and precise dimensions by integrating: - Categories, subcategories, topics, subtopics and concepts of 1 year, correlated with agreed or applicable standards; - 1 to n indicators that correlate with categories, subcategories, topics, subtopics and concepts; - 1 year evidence such as citations, codes, data, documents, files, guidelines, inspections, investigations, laws, plans, policies, procedures, programs, protocols, questionnaires, records, regulations, reports, reviews, statements, statutes, studies , surveys, as well as similar or related evidence that confirms the occurrence or not of compliance with any indicator. There are main categories, correlated with standards, indicators and evidence that, together, allow a multidimensional, quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the condition or situation of compliance in the progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities by any company, body or entity of construction. The concepts disclosed respect the measurement systems that currently exist for each precept of individualized systems, which have been agreed upon and accepted by the construction industry. The categories, principles or topics of the universe of standards are, among others: Activities prior to execution of the work Activities during the execution of the work Closing and settlement activities Each topic includes all the indicators that provide information on the effectiveness and ease with which any company, body or entity of construction complies with the provisions arranged by the system progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities, as well as the categories and standards. The standards measure with objectivity, impartiality and reliability the observance and fulfillment the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities. User: Any company, body or entity of construction that can use the system progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities. Qualification: It is a dictum that focuses on the results of the evaluation that companies, entities or organisms will submit and the level of evaluation obtained. Perception of the company, body or entity of construction, about the way the application is administered of the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities. Qualitative and quantitative techniques are used in the analysis of the above. Evaluation Process: The Evaluation Process integrates a set of steps, stages, actions and activities to demonstrate compliance or non-compliance with the Standards. The evaluation process may be verified, valued and accredited by any person, whether belonging to the company, body or entity in construction or someone outside. The general objective of the evaluation process of the progress of construction and infrastructure works, installations and facilities By telesupervision in the modality of distance work or telework is to integrate a set of steps, stages, actions and activities to demonstrate the occurrence of the application of best practices in the field of the progress of construction and infrastructure of works, installations and facilities, with the help of an algorithm. Algorithm: The algorithm for the evaluation of companies, entities or organisms establishes the relationship between the evaluation levels developed according to prestigious and methodologically rigorous criteria. It defines the degree of compliance of a company, entity or body with respect to the universe of standards, indicators, metrics and evidence. Follow-up: The monitoring system will be based on project management tools recognized in the market and will allow a cross-sectional view of the status of the processes, which can be configured to the assigned access and adapted according to the evaluation plans. The monitoring system can include a status subsystem to monitor the progress of the evaluation processes, improvement programs and maintenance of performance levels that have been developed, which can be maintained in real time, being able to display information in various known formats regarding the project stages, progress, incidents, requested changes, risks, knowledge and lessons learned related to evaluation processes, improvement programs or maintenance of compliance. Said events may include reports or occurrences on issues related to the evaluation processes, programs to improve or maintain the level of compliance, reports on the level of compliance or non-compliance with the Standards, be they regional, national or international and other similar factors. The information entered into the system can be categorized according to the topics and / or problems with which it relates and then displayed through the status subsystem. It will be appreciated that those of ordinary skill will understand that the embodiment and subsystems described in this document are exemplary and that the concepts disclosed may be implemented depending on design decisions, using variations of these subsystems that may be implemented as separate subsystems or combined into multiple. systems. faceted subsystems within the scope of the disclosed concepts. The information entered into the system can be categorized according to the topics and / or problems with which it relates and then displayed through the status subsystem. It will be appreciated that those of ordinary skill will understand that the embodiment and subsystems described in this document are exemplary and that the concepts disclosed may be implemented depending on design decisions, using variations of these subsystems that may be implemented as separate subsystems or combined into multiple. systems. Subsystems within the scope of the disclosed concepts. The information entered into the system can be categorized according to the topics and / or problems with which it relates and then displayed through the status subsystem. It will be appreciated that those of ordinary skill will understand that the embodiment and subsystems described in this document are exemplary and that the disclosed concepts may be implemented depending on design decisions, using variations of these subsystems that can be implemented as separate subsystems or combined into multiple systems. Subsystems within the scope of the disclosed concepts. The status subsystem may include a global status system that can display progress reports to any company, body or entity of construction subject to the assessment process, improvement program or maintenance of the level of compliance, and may also be able to identify, report and / or show the evaluation processes, improvement programs or maintenance of compliance and / or performance levels that may be in a situation of possible bias, risk, failure or other similar deviation. The system may also include a measurement and evaluation subsystem that can track and display information related to a comparison of the planned progress of the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of performance levels versus the actual reported progress of the same. Such a measurement and evaluation system can highlight areas in which progress has been in line with planned progress and / or deficient or delayed areas, and the reasons for this. The system can allow to parameterize the evaluation results so that they can be compared through the evaluation of other subsystems of constructions, works and installations based on these parameters. Any of the parameters that affect the evaluation process. The system may include a user interface, preferably a graphical user interface, that is intuitive and easy to use. The user interface can present screens or websites that can display information in different formats (such as signposts, classification tables, impact / complexity matrices, geo-referenced map, technical specifications, requirements, critical events, graphs, agreements, reports of progress and any other known method). The information displayed can be related to the evaluation process, program for improvement or maintenance of performance levels and its description, start dates, end dates, days remaining, responsible, areas in coordination, audiovisual evidence of the current state, resources exercised, budget committed and available, The system may also include a subsystem for the assessment and evaluation of the international standards used in the evaluation process, program of improvement or maintenance of performance level compliance. Includes an assessment of standards applied in each company, organization or entity of construction, by agents and / or other specialized users in the same study. Similarly, a meeting monitoring subsystem can be included to help organize and coordinate meetings of all staff working on various aspects of the meeting. Evaluation process, program of improvement or maintenance of the level of compliance. The monitoring subsystem can also provide a method to capture, safeguard, or summarize critical requirements or events discussed at the meeting or any agreements discussed or reached. An alert subsystem may be included to send notifications to personnel working on various aspects of the assessment process, improvement program, or maintenance of compliance. Such notifications can be sent, for example, when a component of the assessment process, improvement program, or compliance maintenance reports success, failure, or bias. These notifications can be sent by email, recorded messages, voicemail, or any other means of communication. The system may include a database subsystem that maintains all information collected and relied on during the evaluation process, the improvement program, or the maintenance of compliance and performance levels. A subsystem of the control center can govern the entry of data into the database. The control center system will allow agents to enter information related to said events directly through a computer terminal, mobile phone or any other computer device, through access to a database, website or any other known means. where such information can be entered. Information can be categorized, processed, analyzed, and otherwise manipulated through the use of computing devices that have access to it. Support and monitoring subsystems can be included to provide information on agreements, requirements, instructions, milestones and / or events in progress or required for effective implementation. This subsystem can also include a notification mechanism to disseminate the status of the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of compliance and performance levels in real time through email, recorded messages, voicemail or any other known means. . A control information subsystem can contain data and information on topics, categories and metrics involved in the evaluation process, improvement program or maintenance of compliance with the performance levels of the company, entity or body in observance of the monitoring of the construction, work or installation with the progress system. This subsystem can be part of the control center, or as discussed more generally above, it can optionally be implemented as a separate subsystem. The system can be built to support the linking of information with the general topics to which it relates. Information related to such topics can be tracked, searched and analyzed using such linking information. Similarly, requests for access to public information can be tracked and linked to the related evaluation process, improvement program, maintenance of performance levels, tests, results, or other indicators used throughout the process. The system can allow the preparation of reports related to the evaluation process, improvement program or compliance maintenance, and said reports can be generated and / or dynamically updated in real time based on the information contained in the system and / or your database. Such reports can allow users or agents to add notes, comments, conclusions, or recommendations to the reports for evaluation by staff working on them. The system can dynamically generate requests for information to the company, entity or body that is in the process of evaluation, improvement program or maintenance of compliance. Said requests can be sent selectively to some of the companies, entities or organizations, or globally to all. 4- TELESUPERVISION OR ONLINE SUPERVISION OF ANY OTHER SYSTEM, ENTITY, COMPANY, PROCESS, PLAN, PROGRAM, VENTURE AND/OR PROJECT THAT: A) IS SUSCEPTIBLE TO EVALUATION, AUDITING AND/OR CERTIFICATION; AND/OR B) WANTS OPPORTUNE CONTROL AND SECURITY OF SENSITIVE LEGAL, OPERATIVE, TECHNICAL OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF INFORMATION OR DATA